tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post3449020555526355529..comments2023-08-07T10:12:10.151-05:00Comments on According to e...: Ancient Chinese Secret? Gender Prediction.Erika (aka "e")http://www.blogger.com/profile/17051946388926947935noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-77674490199796262182011-09-03T07:27:24.256-05:002011-09-03T07:27:24.256-05:00Also most people don't know you have to figure...Also most people don't know you have to figure out the LUNAR MONTH you concieved. example: June 2008 was the 5th lunar month. So most of these charts online are wrong. This one is a good one though:<br /><br />http://www.chinesegenderchart.info/pregnancy-chart-gender-selection/howitwork.html<br /><br />as well as this one:<br /><br />http://www.thelaboroflove.com/chart/pred.html<br /><br />TAmyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05141404945991036043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-90708019055935857312011-09-03T07:25:55.838-05:002011-09-03T07:25:55.838-05:00And what people also know is the conception month ...And what people also know is the conception month needs to be translated into "lunar conception month". For example June 2008 was the 5th lunar month not 6th. This is by far the best web site since it tells you exactly how to calculate everything<br /><br />http://www.chinesegenderchart.info/pregnancy-chart-gender-selection/howitwork.htmlAmyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05141404945991036043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-88799071623770570272008-08-20T14:20:00.000-05:002008-08-20T14:20:00.000-05:00I have two daughters - the chart was 50% correct. ...I have two daughters - the chart was 50% correct. I even checked the entire week around what I think was the conception date just to be sure.<BR/><BR/>Yup, 50% correct for my 2 daughters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-80572411767145608342008-08-17T11:22:00.000-05:002008-08-17T11:22:00.000-05:00Hi e - I've been reading for a while, started with...Hi e - <BR/><BR/>I've been reading for a while, started with "Long Live Locke" and moved on over to "according to e" not too long ago. Here's my two cents - both my girls were conceived naturally, and I'm pretty positive about the dates - I put in all the info and both came up boys! Sorry, put us in the "didn't work" column. <BR/><BR/>Keep up the blogging - I'll keep reading!Rimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06499390813654469057noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-49612531444102237042008-08-15T07:21:00.000-05:002008-08-15T07:21:00.000-05:00How timely is this post!! For fun I used the chart...How timely is this post!! For fun I used the chart after we conceived and it said girl. But we had our ultrasound yesterday and our baby is clearly a boy!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-4602718055973936232008-08-14T16:10:00.000-05:002008-08-14T16:10:00.000-05:00The Other E - Yes, I have actually seen that baby ...The Other E - Yes, I have actually seen that baby name thing before, I love it! Very cool.<BR/><BR/>- eErika (aka "e")https://www.blogger.com/profile/17051946388926947935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-47969509443867913252008-08-14T12:51:00.000-05:002008-08-14T12:51:00.000-05:00e,Here is something that DOES work ... in a manner...e,<BR/><BR/>Here is something that DOES work ... in a manner of speaking.<BR/><BR/>Check out http://www.babynamewizard.com/voyager<BR/><BR/>Which is a glorious way to waste time and see the naming fads come and go. Click on the cursor and start typing letters to see the graphs (and/or select male/female).<BR/><BR/>Good ways to see names you haven't thought of ... or names to avoid because of saturation.<BR/><BR/>Fun and addictive.<BR/><BR/>The Other EAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-76565742313481397062008-08-14T11:47:00.000-05:002008-08-14T11:47:00.000-05:00Anon - I'm almost glad to hear it didn't work for ...Anon - I'm almost glad to hear it didn't work for a few of you... it was getting too freaky! Plus, I had the hunch that it couldn't be 100% right or it would be much more mainstream...<BR/><BR/>- eErika (aka "e")https://www.blogger.com/profile/17051946388926947935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-38034718934243607242008-08-14T11:13:00.000-05:002008-08-14T11:13:00.000-05:00I just checked and it didn't work for me and we co...I just checked and it didn't work for me and we conceived naturally. I even checked the day before and after in case I was a day out. <BR/>Sorry! <BR/><BR/>Interesting theory though!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-25442354128913922952008-08-14T11:08:00.000-05:002008-08-14T11:08:00.000-05:00Scott and Melanie - Thanks for replying... very in...Scott and Melanie - Thanks for replying... very interesting. On the site I linked to, there was a poll and about 30% of the people said it didn't work for them... so who knows if they conceived via other methods or whatnot. <BR/><BR/>We'll see if anyone else replies!<BR/><BR/>- eErika (aka "e")https://www.blogger.com/profile/17051946388926947935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-70723824925079060022008-08-14T11:04:00.000-05:002008-08-14T11:04:00.000-05:00This prediction method was incorrect for us. Our ...This prediction method was incorrect for us. Our son was conceived via IVF so I am positive of the exact time of his conception. Maybe the ancient Chinese scientist didn't think to account for any differences caused by 1980s reproductive technology!Melhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06644376488664527391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26412800.post-87037057919770762722008-08-14T10:58:00.000-05:002008-08-14T10:58:00.000-05:00Chalk up another victory for the ACLCGP. It was ri...Chalk up another victory for the ACLCGP. It was right for us.Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08740168715588670295noreply@blogger.com